diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d78fa62..593a472 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ df = DeepFace.find(img_path = "img1.jpg", db_path = "C:/workspace/my_db", model_
 
 <p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serengil/deepface/master/icon/deepface-wrapped-models.png" width="95%" height="95%"></p>
 
-FaceNet, VGG-Face, ArcFace and Dlib [overperforms](https://youtu.be/i_MOwvhbLdI) than OpenFace, DeepFace and DeepID based on experiments. Supportively, FaceNet (/w 512d) got 99.65%; ArcFace got 99.40%; Dlib got 99.38%; VGG-Face got 98.78%; DeepID got 97.05; OpenFace got 93.80% accuracy scores on [LFW data set](https://sefiks.com/2020/08/27/labeled-faces-in-the-wild-for-face-recognition/) whereas human beings could have just 97.53%.
+FaceNet, VGG-Face, ArcFace and Dlib [overperforms](https://youtu.be/i_MOwvhbLdI) than OpenFace, DeepFace and DeepID based on experiments. Supportively, Facenet /w 512d got 99.65%; FaceNet got 99.2%; ArcFace got 99.40%; Dlib got 99.38%; VGG-Face got 98.78%; DeepID got 97.05; OpenFace got 93.80% accuracy scores on [LFW data set](https://sefiks.com/2020/08/27/labeled-faces-in-the-wild-for-face-recognition/) whereas human beings could have just 97.53%.
 
 **Similarity**