diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 0e824da..b937a39 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ demography = DeepFace.analyze("img4.jpg", detector_backend = backends[4]) [RetinaFace](https://sefiks.com/2021/04/27/deep-face-detection-with-retinaface-in-python/) and [MTCNN](https://sefiks.com/2020/09/09/deep-face-detection-with-mtcnn-in-python/) seem to overperform in detection and alignment stages but they are slower than others. If the speed of your pipeline is more important, then you should use opencv or ssd. On the other hand, if you consider the accuracy, then you should use retinaface or mtcnn. + **API** - [`Demo`](https://youtu.be/HeKCQ6U9XmI)