diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 2e4b54d..79abe99 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -138,18 +138,18 @@ embedding_objs = DeepFace.represent(img_path = "img.jpg", FaceNet, VGG-Face, ArcFace and Dlib are [overperforming](https://youtu.be/i_MOwvhbLdI) ones based on experiments. You can find out the scores of those models below on [Labeled Faces in the Wild](https://sefiks.com/2020/08/27/labeled-faces-in-the-wild-for-face-recognition/) set declared by its creators. -| Model | Declared LFW Score | -| --- | --- | -| VGG-Face | 98.9% | -| Facenet | 99.2% | -| Facenet512 | 99.6% | -| OpenFace | 92.9% | -| DeepID | 97.4% | -| Dlib | 99.3 % | -| SFace | 99.5% | -| ArcFace | 99.5% | -| GhostFaceNet | 99.7% | -| *Human-beings* | *97.5%* | +| Model | Declared LFW Score | +| -------------- | ------------------ | +| VGG-Face | 98.9% | +| Facenet | 99.2% | +| Facenet512 | 99.6% | +| OpenFace | 92.9% | +| DeepID | 97.4% | +| Dlib | 99.3 % | +| SFace | 99.5% | +| ArcFace | 99.5% | +| GhostFaceNet | 99.7% | +| *Human-beings* | *97.5%* | Conducting experiments with those models within DeepFace may reveal disparities compared to the original studies, owing to the adoption of distinct detection or normalization techniques. Furthermore, some models have been released solely with their backbones, lacking pre-trained weights. Thus, we are utilizing their re-implementations instead of the original pre-trained weights. @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ cd scripts