mirror of
https://github.com/serengil/deepface.git
synced 2025-06-07 20:15:21 +00:00
Merge pull request #1000 from serengil/feat-task-0302-stock-images-update
source image updated
This commit is contained in:
commit
50ce9f0c4b
@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ face_objs = DeepFace.extract_faces(img_path = "img.jpg",
|
||||
|
||||
Face recognition models are actually CNN models and they expect standard sized inputs. So, resizing is required before representation. To avoid deformation, deepface adds black padding pixels according to the target size argument after detection and alignment.
|
||||
|
||||
<p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serengil/deepface/master/icon/deepface-detectors-v3.jpg" width="90%" height="90%"></p>
|
||||
<p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serengil/deepface/master/icon/detector-outputs-20230203.jpg" width="90%" height="90%"></p>
|
||||
|
||||
[RetinaFace](https://sefiks.com/2021/04/27/deep-face-detection-with-retinaface-in-python/) and [MTCNN](https://sefiks.com/2020/09/09/deep-face-detection-with-mtcnn-in-python/) seem to overperform in detection and alignment stages but they are much slower. If the speed of your pipeline is more important, then you should use opencv or ssd. On the other hand, if you consider the accuracy, then you should use retinaface or mtcnn.
|
||||
|
||||
|
BIN
icon/detector-outputs-20230203.jpg
Normal file
BIN
icon/detector-outputs-20230203.jpg
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 470 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 210 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 403 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 350 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 502 KiB |
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user