doi added

This commit is contained in:
Sefik Ilkin Serengil 2024-04-30 20:19:36 +01:00
parent 0a159b2247
commit f2a614846d
3 changed files with 28 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ If you use deepface in your research for facial recogntion purposes, please cite
@article{serengil2024lightface,
title = {A Benchmark of Facial Recognition Pipelines and Co-Usability Performances of Modules},
author = {Serengil, Sefik Ilkin and Ozpinar, Alper},
journal = {Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi},
journal = {Bilisim Teknolojileri Dergisi},
volume = {17},
number = {2},
pages = {XX},
pages = {95-107},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.17671/gazibtd.XXX},
url = {XXX},
doi = {10.17671/gazibtd.1399077},
url = {https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gazibtd/issue/84331/1399077},
publisher = {Gazi University}
}
```

View File

@ -349,13 +349,13 @@ If you use deepface in your research for facial recogntion purposes, please cite
@article{serengil2024lightface,
title = {A Benchmark of Facial Recognition Pipelines and Co-Usability Performances of Modules},
author = {Serengil, Sefik Ilkin and Ozpinar, Alper},
journal = {Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi},
journal = {Bilisim Teknolojileri Dergisi},
volume = {17},
number = {2},
pages = {XX},
pages = {95-107},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.17671/gazibtd.XXX},
url = {XXX},
doi = {10.17671/gazibtd.1399077},
url = {https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gazibtd/issue/84331/1399077},
publisher = {Gazi University}
}
```

View File

@ -8,10 +8,7 @@ You can reproduce the results by executing the `Perform-Experiments.ipynb` and `
ROC curves provide a valuable means of evaluating the performance of different models on a broader scale. The following illusration shows ROC curves for different facial recognition models alongside their optimal configurations yielding the highest accuracy scores.
<!--
<p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serengil/deepface/master/icon/benchmarks.jpg" width="95%" height="95%"></p>
-->
<p align="center"><img src="../icon/benchmarks.jpg" width="95%" height="95%"></p>
In summary, FaceNet-512d surpasses human-level accuracy, while FaceNet-128d reaches it, with Dlib, VGG-Face, and ArcFace closely trailing but slightly below, and GhostFaceNet and SFace making notable contributions despite not leading, while OpenFace, DeepFace, and DeepId exhibit lower performance.
@ -114,3 +111,22 @@ Please note that humans achieve a 97.5% accuracy score on the same dataset. Conf
| ssd |**97.9** |97.0 |96.7 |96.6 |89.4 |91.5 |93.0 |69.9 |68.7 |63.8 |
| opencv |96.2 |92.9 |95.8 |93.2 |91.5 |93.3 |91.7 |71.1 |68.1 |61.1 |
| skip |91.4 |67.6 |90.6 |54.8 |69.3 |78.4 |83.4 |57.4 |62.6 |61.1 |
# Citation
Please cite deepface in your publications if it helps your research - see [`CITATIONS`](https://github.com/serengil/deepface/blob/master/CITATION.md) for more details. Here is its BibTex entry:
```BibTeX
@article{serengil2024lightface,
title = {A Benchmark of Facial Recognition Pipelines and Co-Usability Performances of Modules},
author = {Serengil, Sefik Ilkin and Ozpinar, Alper},
journal = {Bilisim Teknolojileri Dergisi},
volume = {17},
number = {2},
pages = {95-107},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.17671/gazibtd.1399077},
url = {https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gazibtd/issue/84331/1399077},
publisher = {Gazi University}
}
```